This is sexy. Or, at least it’s about getting sexy. Oh, also I talk about internalized transphobia
I’ve been a top my whole sex life. I have always initiated sex; I’ve always been the one to explore my partners’ bodies, to listen and watch and tease them until they just ache to come, and I’ve rarely had others do the same to me. Now, when I was identifying as a woman or a girl, being a top was a gender rebellion as much as it was and is just what I find hot. To a culture that taught me that I was supposed to wait and be acted on, I said fuck you, I’ll go get what I want, which was and is fucking people until they shake and see stars. During that period of my life, envelopment in a variety of forms was sort of expected of me, and it seemed consistent with the way that I topped people to take them inside me. I thought very little of it.
The context of all of this changed when I started identifying as a man, because I don’t want to define my femme masculinity by having power over others. Dominant culture values and assigns power to topping and penetration, as associated with masculinity, but systematically devalues (and denies the active existence of) bottoming and envelopment, as associated with femininity. If I am a man who only tops and penetrates but does not bottom or envelop, I feel like I am perpetuating dominant cultural power dynamics. I don’t want to be that guy.
For me, the need to re-evaluate my complicity in gender power dynamics is most salient in my sexiness with cis and trans women, and other trans and genderqueer people. Recently, I’ve bottomed a couple times, and it’s a little strange for me. For the first time, I realized for that bottoming is an actually active role: I mean, I don’t know how to let someone else just pay attention to me and adore my body. The closest I had ever been to that was in mutual topping situations, and that’s far different. Until I tried bottoming, I never really understood it, but now I think maybe I’m a perpetual top because I haven’t developed the capacity to bottom. I’m not sure whether I should work on bottoming to avoid contributing to patriarchal cultural currents, or if I can be a man who mostly tops because that’s what I like. Loving my body and expressing my desires is radical in a world that does not acknowledge or support my existence, but I don’t know how to separate myself from garbage romantic comedies and beauty magazines that shaped the clinging remnants of the romance myth in my mind. I can’t claim not to be a product of my culture, no matter how hard I work against it.
When I’m getting sexy and I listen to my cravings pulsing through me, I usually want to be inside whomever I’m getting sexy with. That’s a culturally expected and valued way of doing masculinity. I’ve found, even with the queers I have sex with, that some people have assumed that I would prefer penetrating them and avoid envelopment. But I usually want them in me as much as I want to move in them, so I ask them, but I worry about whether they’ll remember that I’m a man after they’ve slid their fingers in my cunt. And it feels comfortable and hot when cis and trans women and other trans and genderqueer people fuck me that way, because I feel like heteropatriarchy doesn’t have as many scripts and expectations for the way my body should fit with theirs. When I’m having sex with people who experience gender oppression, envelopment still feels like a gender rebellion, because I’m refusing to play the privileged exclusively penetrating role.
Because patriarchal culture denies my existence as a man, when I get sexy with cismen, I feel this anxiety knot in my stomach that if I do anything but top them, they will forget that I’m a man, and they won’t remember that I’m male-bodied. So, the meanings of my desires change depending on who I’m getting sexy with, because it seems as if it’s easier for people to assign me to the woman category if I’m getting sexy with a cisman. A while ago, I was getting sexy with a cisman friend, and he asked to lay himself down between my legs. And holy fuck, I wanted to wrap myself around him, so I did. And it felt so good to move with him and feel my hard clit slide against him. And he asked if it felt good, and I was just intoxicated on the hotness between us. Even though I was topping at that moment, that position holds cultural value as a woman-assigned position in dominant culture. In that position, I’m anxious that I could be destroying the social legitimacy of my masculinity, even though I don’t usually attempt to present in a dominant culturally valued masculine way. I mean, it is just no fun to be mis-gendered in my own bed. Even if a particular person is supportive and respectful, the memory is real, and the threat feels present.
I don’t know how to separate my desires from internalized transphobia, that is, defining myself by dominant cultural ideas about my body, and accepting woman-assigned sexual roles. I don’t want to perpetuate some boring hetero sexual trajectory, but there are some things, like wrapping my legs around my partners, and taking them inside me, that I don’t want to give up. I don’t know how to get what I want outside of patriarchal socialization that makes me want what I was going to get any way.
Tags: body love, bottom, cultural criticism, experience, femininity, feminism, feminist, ftm, gender, gender identity, gender presentation, genderqueer, internalized oppression, internalized transphobia, male-bodied, man, masculinity, men, patriarchy, presentation, privilege, queer, self-determination, sex, sexuality, top, trans, transgender, transman
February 10, 2010 at 6:48 pm |
Sometimes I think we feminists tie ourselves up in knots worrying about if our sex lives are radically correct.
I have found on the one hand that’s it’s important to always be challenging myself and others about desire and actions. I would never say to stop doing this.
But I think that the real power of feminism, like any social movement, is in the mass organizations of people changing the world. The idea of “personal is political” gets over simplified I think, sometimes people get the idea like their personal relationships are _the_ real battle ground. I think this does the movement a real disservice because it can cause people to deny themselves the kind of pleasure that they WANT. On the other hand it lets folks cop-out of doing feminist organizing because they feel like they are doing enough in their personal lives by having the right sort of sex and relationships. I think this is a real tragedy for the movement and a misdirection of our energies.
I’m not criticizing you for thinking about this, I’m trying to tell you how I stopped being so worried about the social impact of my sex life, which let me just get on with it and have fun.
The truth is that if you are conducting yourself in an honourable, respectful fashion, and you are having fun, that you are dong fine. Do what you like.
February 11, 2010 at 5:46 pm |
I don’t think The Real Battle can be located in one place, because there is so much work to be done, and no one can participate in all of it. I think there are a number of ways to work against white supremacy and patriarchy and homophobia and ableism and transphobia and sexism, and that a lot of tactics are necessary, useful, and equally valuable. I don’t think I’m tying myself up in knots or so worried that I don’t get sexy. I just try to be thoughtful about the ways that I get sexy with others. Changing relationships and dynamics is as much real work as boycotts or direct survivor support or supporting feminist art and media or writing political analysis or writing letters to prisoners.
I think my work will be cultural work, specifically, growing a culture of egalitarian consent as an alternative that I hope will supplant rape culture. It’s really vital to that work that I understand the meanings of my interactions as I’m working to understand pieces of a culture that I want to dismantle and replace.
February 12, 2010 at 12:43 pm |
Thanks for writing this. I can relate to a lot of what you have written here. I haven’t had the guts yet to play with cismen since I began FTM transition. I play (an switch) with ciswomen, trans women and trans boys and I miss interacting sexually (and in BDSM contexts) with cismen. But I worry that most cismen will suddenly see me as a woman the minute they see me naked. At women and trans play parties, I can walk around topless and, even though I haven’t had top surgery, the people there still don’t waver in their ability to refer to me as “he.” I’m not convinced that many cismen would be able to keep calling me “he” in the face of boobs. So I shy away from male play spaces. Sad really, why would I deny myself the pleasure?
February 12, 2010 at 12:46 pm |
Thanks for your response. Sometimes I think I’m the only person who experiences these things, and it feels really good to hear from you that you’ve had similar experiences.
March 2, 2010 at 7:29 pm |
“If I am a man who only tops and penetrates but does not bottom or envelop, I feel like I am perpetuating dominant cultural power dynamics. I don’t want to be that guy.”
Why don’t you just top and bottom depending on what feels good to you physically? If you want to top someone, and they want to be topped, who gives a shit if it’s what the dominant culture endorses? Altering what you do in bed because it’s not “socially correct” isn’t healthy.
March 2, 2010 at 8:44 pm |
Well, like I said, I give a shit about whether I’m being oppressive or not, and I like to be thoughtful about the way that I’m sexy with others. It’s not about being socially correct; it’s about living in a way that does not perpetuate harmful hierarchies.
I don’t need you to tell me what is healthy and what is not. I got enough of that in my fundamentalist Christian upbringing.
March 20, 2010 at 10:53 pm |
A small thought on that same top/penetrate vs bottom/envelop quote. I think that topping while enveloping and bottoming while penetrating should be totally possible, and could be very fun! Not to mention challenging a normative binary.
Thanks for the word “envelop,” by the way. A housemate of mine says he considers masculinity to be “giving,” and femininity to be “receiving,” and this definition really pisses me off. Envelop is a wonderfully active word. Yay!
August 17, 2010 at 7:38 am |
Appreciating this smart and thoughtful writing this morning. I have a long rambling train of thought about transguys of butch history/experience having different sexual socializations that transguys who have not spent time in those communities, and how that makes a difference, which I will spare the internets until I have a better handle on it.